Features Chronicle Opinion
Stroke of genius

Robert Miehle established the Two-Revolution press as an industry standard

January 13, 2021  By Nick Howard

A Miehle Two-Revolution press, circa 1915.

No one ever said business is fair; it never was, and never will be. The best and worst of our humanity often surfaces under the guise of “doing business.” It was during the wild days of the 1880s in Chicago that a 23-year-old finished his apprenticeship and graduated to the rank of pressman at the famous Poole Brothers Printing Company. Frustrated with the constant clanging and banging of his two-revolution cylinder press, Robert Miehle spent hours on his back under his press, observing how the “Mangle-Drive” functioned to move the type-bed back and forth. The mechanical movement, first adopted by Germany’s Koenig & Bauer, was instrumental in Koenig’s Times of London press of 1814. Although hi-tech engineering in 1814, the Mangle continued to be used well into the late-1900s.

Armed with a small notepad, Miehle began drawing sketches of potential design improvements. Without an engineering background, Miehle spent his off-hours studying books and learning the art of mechanical principles. He spent countless hours crawling under his press during the day, intently observing the drive and bed mechanisms. By 1884, Miehle had a solution; one that would drive the bed and cylinder in perfect harmony and, more importantly, eliminate the jarring that occurred with the Mangle! That same year, Miehle was issued his first patent, followed quickly by two other revisions.

Most improvements don’t last for 60 years, but Miehle’s did

A portrait of Robert Miehle, taken circa 1920.

What Miehle was able to accomplish would resonate for the next sixty years. Using a novel mechanical movement called “The Scotch Yoke”, Miehle then discovered Englishman Joseph Whitworth’s alteration known as “The Whitworth Quick Return Mechanism”, the imparting of a rotational force (gear) into a linear force (bed) with the bed increasing speed upon its return. Miehle’s design provided a much smoother, and ultimately superior, printing result. These mechanical principles were also finding their way into many other new technologies, including machine-tools and reciprocating engines. Large pipe organs were also early adaptors of the Scotch Yoke principle. Miehle claimed that, “a pica em quad standing on the bed would not be tumbled over even at a speed of 4,000-bed reversals an hour”. However, what was even more remarkable was that Miehle’s design displaced the cylinder gear, which removed the jarring effect of typical printing presses of the day.


During the late 1800s, our industry primarily used two design systems: the “Single-Revolution” (characterized by a massive impression cylinder and Mangle) and the “Stop-Cylinder,” favoured by the Germans. Robert Miehle had now surpassed both earlier methods and did it in just a matter of months. Miehle established the “Two-Revolution” as an industry standard; however, Miehle didn’t invent the Two-Revolution, which had the impression cylinder take two full turns on each printing cycle. David Napier, a Scot, developed it in the 1820s. Napier is also considered the inventor of the first metal “gripper”, which eliminated silk bands or string to transfer the sheet.

It wasn’t long before competitors were to discard previous prior-art and embrace (copy or reverse engineer) the Miehle design. German manufacturers, including Koenig & Bauer, quickly came up with identical machines, as did the majority of American builders. Plenty of court cases ensued in the United States, with one particularly nasty fight that played out in a Cook County courtroom and the public press. In 1899, the Campbell Printing Press Company was sued by the Miehle Printing Press & Manufacturing Company, with Miehle citing patent violations used by Campbell. Miehle lost and Campbell took out full-page ads touting their win and superiority over the Miehle Two-Revolution design, even though Robert Miehle’s DNA was all over Campbell’s machines. In the case, the Judge concluded that Miehle had used a version of the Scotch Yoke principle and could, therefore, not sue to stop others using something considered in the public domain.

By November 1885, Robert Miehle finally completed wood patterns and had the parts cast in iron at Tarrant Foundries. Once completed, the castings were taken to a Chicago Avenue printing shop where Miehle’s brother, John, was employed. After assembling the first press, word spread quickly through Printer’s Row saloons and a steady stream of industry types, from pressmen to owners, paraded through Miehle’s shop, all praising the design. Now all Miehle needed was something he never had: money. The old saying, “he doesn’t have a pot to pee in, nor a window to throw it out off,” summed up many inventors’ financial situations in the nineteenth century. Robert Miehle had to find someone to fund his new printing press.

“Mr. Miehle, I have a proposition for you.”

An early advertisement for a Miehle press, from 1892.

Samuel K. White would become that money source for Miehle. White already had a going concern at a building on Market Street, between Washington and Madison. Although known for his paging and numbering machines, White also dabbled in machine-tools and occasionally tried his lot as an inventor. White had even designed and constructed a paper cutter. It wasn’t long before White realized the significance of Miehle’s invention. In short order, White rustled up two business friends to form a partnership of what would become the iconic Miehle Printing Press & Manufacturing Company. On December 8, 1890, the three men convened for the first meeting of the new company. However, Robert Miehle wasn’t invited. Miehle had no way of coming up with his share of the $50,000 seed money ($1,415,000 today). Instead, Miehle cut a deal directly with White that would have his patent rights assigned to White in exchange for a royalty on all presses sold and a ten-year contract as chief designer. The company that bore Miehle’s name would ironically never have Robert Miehle as a shareholder; a blunder he would come to regret.

The first press produced by the newly incorporated company would leave the White factory in March of 1891, and to the surprise of Robert Miehle, would not bear the name “MIEHLE” on its side-frame, but instead, the name “S.K. WHITE,” in bas-relief. Our Howard Iron Works Museum has one of these early S.K. White machines. Business became so brisk that the factory expanded later in the year and moved to the corner of Clinton and Fulton Streets in Chicago. With profits rolling in, the three partners were making substantial returns on their investments. Robert Miehle, stung by his gullible mistake, left the company in 1892 only to return later that year after his compensation was increased, and the “S.K. WHITE” moniker was replaced with “The MIEHLE P.P. & MFG CO.”

During Chicago’s World’s Columbian Exposition of 1893, Miehle showcased their press and walked away with a medal and a prize diploma, and was chosen to print The Book of the Fair. It was about this time that a lawyer hailing from Canada set eyes upon the Miehle Company, who just happened to be across the street from his thriving sash and door weights factory. Canadian John Hewitt emigrated to the United States, but not to practice law, as it turned out. Hewitt began his American dream selling lightning rods to farmers across the country until he settled down in Chicago. Eventually buying into Miehle, Hewitt would ultimately force White out and ascend to the Miehle Company’s presidency.

The multi-purpose Miehle

By 1919, Miehle was manufacturing 23 models, including an earlier introduction of a massive 7/0 that handled a sheet size of 49 ½” x 73 ½”. Robert Miehle continued developing technologies, obtaining patents, and with his improved financial remuneration, soon found himself living in a large home on the North Side while being driven to and from work in his prized Stanley Steamer automobile.

At the beginning of the twentieth century, there seemed little fear that Robert Miehle might find himself ensconced in front of Chicago’s Wrigley Building, selling used pencils from a tin cup for a penny apiece.

The company’s early foray into Europe also proved surprisingly lucrative. In 1899, Hewitt traveled to England, where he consummated a deal with the Printing Machinery Company Limited (later renamed Linotype & Machinery) to manufacture Miehles under license in Great Britain and Ireland. This deal alone brought in £20,000 (an astounding £2,586,000 today!).

Quickly the Miehle Printing Press Company gained a substantial share of the world market, which positioned them at the pinnacle of a burgeoning sheetfed printing industry. A timely encounter with a Milwaukee inventor in 1920 would provide another milestone for the company. Edward Cheshire had designed a new little 13 x 19-inch printing press that ironically used the “Stop-Cylinder” principle long discarded by Miehle. Instead of a normal horizontal plane of the type bed, this machine held the bed and type vertically. The Miehle Company soon latched onto this concept as they were looking for a small “jobber” to complete their offerings. In 1921, Miehle purchased Cheshire’s “Milwaukee Automatic Press Company,” and the now renamed “MIEHLE-VERTICAL” would quickly become a top seller; remaining in production until 1974! After some research, I estimate well over twenty-two thousand MIEHLE-VERTICALs were manufactured.

“You never hear of a Miehle press being scrapped.”

Considering the length and breadth of the Two-Revolution Miehle success, including Europe, Scandinavia, South America, China, Japan and most of Southeast Asia, Miehle would reign as the undisputed leader in its field. The Chinese even printed currency on a Miehle, and the Swiss loved the Miehle, especially for printing Bibles. American and Canadian printers would also purchase the lion’s share of Miehle presses for generations to come.

Robert Miehle would live until 1932, but his legacy and name would remain at the forefront of the North American printing industry until 1990, when Rockwell International (who had purchased MGD in 1969) discontinued what had been a 39-year relationship with Germany’s Faber & Schleicher, now known as Manroland. Since 1951, every Roland press that arrived in Canada and the USA was emblazoned with the MIEHLE name. It wasn’t until several years after Manroland’s arrival that the Roland name would supplant that of Miehle to Americans and Canadians alike.

Ironically, I have one of those “six degrees of separation” tales concerning Miehle. The Toronto Type Foundry represented the Miehle Company for decades, going back to before 1912. My father worked for TTF, and I remember when he came home and told the family TTF was closing their doors. Miehle (which was now part of a triumvirate of three businesses – Miehle, Goss, and Dexter) decided that they (MGD) wouldn’t renew TTF’s contract and would instead sell directly in Canada. In 1966, TTF simply closed shop after being in business since 1887. The TTF owner was Mr. W.J. Palmer, whose family roots went back to San Francisco in 1878 and a type foundry and press builder known as Palmer & Rey.

MGD’s destruction of an 80-year-old sales partner remained an invaluable business lesson I have never forgotten. When you work for, or represent a manufacturer, nothing is assured, and you might go to bed a peacock, but awaken as a feather duster. My father’s abrupt unemployed status resulted in our company, Howard Graphic Equipment Ltd. Perhaps had it not been for Robert Miehle, I may never have written this article.

There was an old slogan Miehle often used: “You Never Hear of a Miehle Press Being Scrapped.” Robert Miehle was no doubt proud of that phrase and, more importantly, of how, as a young man of twenty-three, lying on his back in a noisy and hot Chicago pressroom, he discovered such a breakthrough that would change the face of print for almost 60 years!


NICK HOWARD, a partner in Howard Graphic Equipment and Howard Iron Works, is a printing historian, consultant and Certified Appraiser of capital equipment.

This article was originally published in the September 2020 issue of PrintAction.

Print this page


Stories continue below